Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Motronic
Some information that experts in their fields have discovered about building 7.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...42.html?page=5
If by "stood up fine" you meant 1/3 of the building was left standing, then yes you are correct. If you are like me, a building with 2/3 of its structure brought to the ground is hardly worthy of the words you used to describe it.
Just so you know, I'm not a hater. I can agree to disagree with most anything. Although sometimes I get upset with this 9/11 conspiracy theory, I just have to remind myself that everyone has, and should not be persecuted for, their own opinions. |
Excellent post.
Funny thing with conspiracies is that they ALWAYS come up with new stuff to question. For example, shortly after popular mechanics answered pretty much EVERY SINGLE MAJOR POINT of the conspiracy theorists with a book debunking the ENTIRE conspiracy theory. Guess what happened?
Thats right, the conspiracy theorists came out WITH THEIR OWN BOOK entitled "
Ok so we were wrong about all that, but what about this !!11111"
And were seeing the same thing here.
I really liked the whole "why is the hole in the pentagon not in the shape of the plane??? hmmmm??? why? why is it not in the shape of a plane!?!?!"
Im sorry, did you expect it to make a cartoon like outline of a plane after it crashed?