Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Motronic
About the pentagon, theorists like to point out the lack of identifiable wreckage at the crash site. Saying there is not a whole lot that resembles the plane. But you take a look at this picture, of a plane that fell from the sky in Africa, and you can see how small and scattered the bulk of the debris is.
http://www.sudan.net/graphic/news/te...lane_crash.jpg
.................................................. .
And in case you don't know. Yes, planes can propel themselves faster than they fall. |
.
Exactly right motronic, the velocity of an object is far more important than its mass when considering the amount of damage it does.
the thing we need to learn from this, isnt that there are no conspiracies, but they are far more simpler then
"some rich dude, able to sneak in explosives into a building with no one noticing while a CIA team helped terrorists that we trained in the 80s crash planes into buildings at the same place where explosives were placed and then detonate the explosives which were somehow undetonated from the plane crashing into the building, then blowing up a nearby building with more explosives which were smuggled in with no one noticeing and then collecting on the insurance money while at the same time someone else was betting on air line stocks to drop and collecting even more money"
or Try,
"Terrorists attacked the US for what they believe are things the US has done wrong against them, and the US used the attack as a political tool to start a war."