911 mysteries....

[Damarl]

when i saw the video, i ditnt tho about conspiracy or its Bush fault or its benladen's fault... i dont mind who's fault, but i knew there was something weird the day those damn tower fell. They fell way too fast for big building like they were. The video talk about conspiracy a lil bit, the man who bough the tower 6 week before... some floor were empty (except for bombs :P). These arent the arguement that make me look the whole thing.

Like Heme said, the lil explosion that burst before the building colapse,,, there's something weird... unless computers can blow up alone... The build the damn building to avoid being crush by planes, and then Bang ! 1 plane and they both fall down 1 hour after... there's some building all over the world that never fel after worst damage.

Conspiracy or not, i dont mind... but i know the damn official story isnt the truth... and i hate lies....

[Kelrathi]

Originally Posted by Damarl

when i saw the video, i ditnt tho about conspiracy or its Bush fault or its benladen's fault... i dont mind who's fault, but i knew there was something weird the day those damn tower fell. They fell way too fast for big building like they were. The video talk about conspiracy a lil bit, the man who bough the tower 6 week before... some floor were empty (except for bombs :P). These arent the arguement that make me look the whole thing.

Like Heme said, the lil explosion that burst before the building colapse,,, there's something weird... unless computers can blow up alone... The build the damn building to avoid being crush by planes, and then Bang ! 1 plane and they both fall down 1 hour after... there's some building all over the world that never fel after worst damage.

Conspiracy or not, i dont mind... but i know the damn official story isnt the truth... and i hate lies....

built to withstand a 707, read on

http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2001/se...wers_built_to/

oh and fire > steel

the fire only needs to heat up the steel enough for the higher floors to make the steel bend, you dont need the steel to melt, so avoid linking me to the "it wasnt hot enough to melt steel!!!!)!)0"

What do you think people mean when they say "the bigger they are, the harder they fall"

What did you expect to happen to the buildings? do you confuse big with strong? In fact if the building was smaller, the firefighters could have started putting out the fire sooner and stopped the steel from melting.

Oh and link me to other buildings of similar size that withstood a plane of this size crashing into it, and i will take back everything. thanks

[Rohanna]

I watched this entire film and it made a lot of interesting theories. I have always thought that the truth was being evaded. I was a member of the Search and Rescue Team for NYSG up until March of 02 when I moved out here to Indy. A bulk of our training seemed to get really involved with FEMA around November 01 and mainly consisted of "terrorist attack" situations when in the past we were only relied upon to help the local law agencies recover lost people. For this simple fact alone I believe in a conspiracy theory.

Bottom line is money makes the world go round and there are only a few people in the world that have enough to impact the world over. There could be many reasons why such an incident happened political or not.

[Damarl]

Originally Posted by Kelrathi

built to withstand a 707, read on

http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2001/se...wers_built_to/

oh and fire > steel

the fire only needs to heat up the steel enough for the higher floors to make the steel bend, you dont need the steel to melt, so avoid linking me to the "it wasnt hot enough to melt steel!!!!)!)0"

What do you think people mean when they say "the bigger they are, the harder they fall"

What did you expect to happen to the buildings? do you confuse big with strong? In fact if the building was smaller, the firefighters could have started putting out the fire sooner and stopped the steel from melting.

Oh and link me to other buildings of similar size that withstood a plane of this size crashing into it, and i will take back everything. thanks

seem to me that you didnt checked the video at all... i suggest you checked it out... and write back what you think about the questions/answer they got.... Oh and i got a good one : why did the damn towers fell both in a superb line from up till down ? if this plane is so big as you say, why its weight havent play in the way the tower fall ? it hasnt fell on any build around... one tower could hav fell on the other... Nahhh it fell from up till down and thats because fire melted the steel...

[Kelrathi]

Originally Posted by Damarl

seem to me that you didnt checked the video at all... i suggest you checked it out... and write back what you think about the questions/answer they got.... Oh and i got a good one : why did the damn towers fell both in a superb line from up till down ? if this plane is so big as you say, why its weight havent play in the way the tower fall ? it hasnt fell on any build around... one tower could hav fell on the other... Nahhh it fell from up till down and thats because fire melted the steel...

It fell from "up" til "down" because gravity goes down.
The higher levels of the steel began to weaken from the heat, and bent, at that moment the higher floors crashed down.

Twenty floors from "up" crashed into a floor "down" then the weight of 21 floors from "up" continued falling crashing into successively lower floors "down"

Now you have 22 floors falling, then 23, straight "down" from "up". Simple physics.



Now youre trying to tell me the plane should have tip the tower onto the other tower? Um, I believe what my eyes saw, now if you want to call your own eyes liars thats fine.

Now that I answered your question, answer mine, which building of similar size IN ALL HUMAN HISTORY has ever reacted differently to a plane smashing into it?

Is there a building some where of comparable hieght that was hit by a plane of similar size and was KNOCKED OVER by the plane?
Or maybe the building for SOME REASON started collapsing from "down" to "up".

I dont get what youre saying about the WEIGHT of the plane? do you understand the size difference of a plane that size that holds a couple hundred, to one of the biggest buildings in human history holding thousands?

The buildings collapsed in the same way because *GASP* they were both of similar hieght, being hit by a plane of similar size at a similar speed and position !!!!111

[Rohanna]

How do you explain building 7 then? It wasn't hit by a plane at all and it still fell like it was demo'd. Oklahoma City took 98% more damage and stood up fine even thought it was bombed and building 7 only took some minor debris from the plane crashes.

[Ganjhitsu]

There are way to many unanswered questions and questions being dodged for this to be a closed case.

But remember Kids: One mans terrorist is another man's Freedom Fighter.

[Haych]

Originally Posted by Rohanna

Oklahoma City took 98% more damage and stood up fine even thought it was bombed.

Fact!

[Motronic]

Originally Posted by Rohanna

How do you explain building 7 then? It wasn't hit by a plane at all and it still fell like it was demo'd. Oklahoma City took 98% more damage and stood up fine even thought it was bombed and building 7 only took some minor debris from the plane crashes.

Some information that experts in their fields have discovered about building 7.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...42.html?page=5


If by "stood up fine" you meant 1/3 of the building was left standing, then yes you are correct. If you are like me, a building with 2/3 of its structure brought to the ground is hardly worthy of the words you used to describe it.


Just so you know, I'm not a hater. I can agree to disagree with most anything. Although sometimes I get upset with this 9/11 conspiracy theory, I just have to remind myself that everyone has, and should not be persecuted for, their own opinions.

[Kelrathi]

Originally Posted by Motronic

Some information that experts in their fields have discovered about building 7.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...42.html?page=5


If by "stood up fine" you meant 1/3 of the building was left standing, then yes you are correct. If you are like me, a building with 2/3 of its structure brought to the ground is hardly worthy of the words you used to describe it.


Just so you know, I'm not a hater. I can agree to disagree with most anything. Although sometimes I get upset with this 9/11 conspiracy theory, I just have to remind myself that everyone has, and should not be persecuted for, their own opinions.

Excellent post.

Funny thing with conspiracies is that they ALWAYS come up with new stuff to question. For example, shortly after popular mechanics answered pretty much EVERY SINGLE MAJOR POINT of the conspiracy theorists with a book debunking the ENTIRE conspiracy theory. Guess what happened?
Thats right, the conspiracy theorists came out WITH THEIR OWN BOOK entitled "Ok so we were wrong about all that, but what about this !!11111"

And were seeing the same thing here.

I really liked the whole "why is the hole in the pentagon not in the shape of the plane??? hmmmm??? why? why is it not in the shape of a plane!?!?!"

Im sorry, did you expect it to make a cartoon like outline of a plane after it crashed?