![]() |
|
|||||||
| Technical Discussion Talk about anything computer related here. Problems, new tech, etc. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ohio, US
Posts: 93
|
9600 GSO vs 9600 GT VS 8800 GT
Just built my new WAR PC a few weeks ago, as well as my girlfriends, and my bestfriends, built them all at the same time. All the same gear except for Vid Card, i went 9600 GT, she: 9600 GSO, and buddy: 8800GT.
Crystal Mark Benchmark @ 10,000 sprites: 9600 GT 32 FPS 9600 GSO 27 FPS 8800 GT 24 FPS Had a real tough time deciding between stream processor count or clock speed... apparently clock speed is where it is at.. Im old school, didn't use to have a stream processor rating last time I bought a card.. But budget KFA2 9600 GT won out...@ only 140 bucks.. not bad ![]() and if your a bit on the noob side to tech. info the human eye cannot detect a difference @ about 25-30 FPS and up, anything below that looks laggy. Last edited by Gigean; 07-07-2008 at 01:16 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ohio, US
Posts: 93
|
agreed, I dont even llike crystal mark, but my friend insisted on it, and since his was done over the phone I couldn't exactly force him to go 3D mark, and I wanted them all on the same benchmark.
But yeah I assumed the gso would do better too, I also did the gso and 9600 gt on burn in test, and GT still won. Last edited by Gigean; 07-07-2008 at 03:16 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Taco Flavored Kisses.
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 357
|
*edited for acuracy, thank you Pwnzilla.
Interesting results you are getting. The 9600GSO should come in slowest and depending on the situation the 9600GT and the 8800GT should be neck and neck. I'm guessing when the drivers are more mature for the 9600GSO it will show better performance. Generally the rule for overall performace has to do with board bandwidth and stream processors. *There are a number of other things that affect overall performance, but without getting too technical, here are is a comparison. 8800GT 57.6 GB/s (112 stream processors) 9600GT 57.6 GB/s (64 stream processors) 9600GSO 38.4 GB/s (96 stream processors) All very similar cards mathmatically though.
__________________
![]() Last edited by Moobsy; 07-07-2008 at 05:13 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Putting the funk in dysfunctional
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Alabama, USA
Posts: 1,218
|
Your values for the memory bandwidth on the 9600GSO appear to be incorrect Moobsy. According to the EVGA website the values for those units are:
9600GSO Performance 550 MHz GPU 96 Processing Cores 400 MHz RAMDAC Memory 384 MB, 192 bit DDR3 1600 MHz (effective) 38.4 GB/s Memory Bandwidth 9600GT Performance 650 MHz GPU 64 Processing Cores 400 MHz RAMDAC Memory 512 MB, 256 bit DDR3 1800 MHz (effective) 57.6 GB/s Memory Bandwidth 8800GT Performance 600 MHz GPU 112 Processing Cores 400 MHz RAMDAC Memory 512 MB, 256 bit DDR3 1800 MHz (effective) 57.6 GB/s Memory Bandwidth As a rule the performance results will follow as laid out by Zer due to the larger number of stream processors in the 8800GT. There are occasional instances where the 9600GT will outperform the 8800GT due to it's higher core/shader clocks. The 9600GSO is hampered by slower clocks and narrower memory bus than the other two as well as fewer stream processors than the 8800GT. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Taco Flavored Kisses.
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 357
|
Quote:
This clearly puts the GSO at the bottom of the performance list in this lineup.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| EVGA 8800 GT | Pedro | Technical Discussion | 20 | 12-06-2007 01:57 PM |
| 7800 GS Upgrade to 8800 GTS | Altair | Technical Discussion | 15 | 01-26-2007 07:55 AM |
| Nvidia 8800 GTX | Cthulhufan | Technical Discussion | 13 | 11-22-2006 08:46 AM |